Access cmshikaku.com. CMS比較.com

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,180 ms

21/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.008

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

cmshikaku.com

875 ms

import.css

333 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

351 ms

jquery.min.js

934 ms

jquery.addclass_os.js

372 ms

Our browser made a total of 159 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (117 requests) were addressed to the original Cmshikaku.com, 5% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 4% (7 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Cmshikaku.com.

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Cmshikaku.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 45.4 kB

Original 58.7 kB
After minification 51.6 kB
After compression 13.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.0 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.4 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 483.0 kB

Original 1.6 MB
After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Cmshikaku needs image optimization as it can save up to 483.0 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-58%

Potential reduce by 62.4 kB

Original 107.2 kB
After minification 97.7 kB
After compression 44.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 62.4 kB or 58% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 84.7 kB

Original 98.5 kB
After minification 78.2 kB
After compression 13.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Cmshikaku.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 84.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Now

156

After Optimization

103

The browser has sent 156 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Cmshikaku. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.