3.2 sec in total
221 ms
1.7 sec
1.3 sec
Visit comparing.ly now to see the best up-to-date Comparing content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about comparing.ly
The one-stop-shop to find comparison of small business solutions. Team Comparingly strives to provide honest and unbiased reviews for the small business services you need. When confused, choose Compar...
Visit comparing.lyWe analyzed Comparing.ly page load time and found that the first response time was 221 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
comparing.ly performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value8.0 s
21/100
10%
Value4,030 ms
1/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value16.3 s
5/100
10%
221 ms
220 ms
353 ms
22 ms
74 ms
Our browser made a total of 114 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Comparing.ly, 46% (53 requests) were made to Cdn.comparingly.com and 18% (20 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (381 ms) relates to the external source Embed.tawk.to.
Page size can be reduced by 339.3 kB (65%)
525.1 kB
185.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Comparing.ly main page is 525.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 353.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 303.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 303.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 35.8 kB or 21% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (66%)
38
13
The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Comparing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
comparing.ly accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
comparing.ly best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
comparing.ly SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Comparing.ly can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Comparing.ly main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
comparing.ly
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Comparing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: