Access constructionjournal.net. CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL - Commercial Construction Leads and Project Information

constructionjournal.net

538 ms

Site.css

290 ms

home_top.js

150 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

756 ms

galleria-1.2.8.min.js

347 ms

Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (81 requests) were addressed to the original Constructionjournal.net, 8% (8 requests) were made to Ecn.dev.virtualearth.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Constructionjournal.net.

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Constructionjournal.net main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 61.2 kB

Original 78.3 kB
After minification 66.1 kB
After compression 17.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.2 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 41.2 kB

Original 1.5 MB
After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 619.7 kB

Original 753.4 kB
After minification 460.3 kB
After compression 133.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 619.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 91.2 kB

Original 107.8 kB
After minification 90.5 kB
After compression 16.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Constructionjournal.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 91.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Now

101

After Optimization

The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of CONSTRUCTION JOURNAL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.