Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

dentalrave.com

Oral-B vs Philips Sonicare Electric Toothbrush 2025 — Deals & Reviews

Page Load Speed

22.4 sec in total

First Response

75 ms

Resources Loaded

21 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

About Website

Visit dentalrave.com now to see the best up-to-date Dentalrave content for Bangladesh and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dentalrave.com

Unlike ordinary electric toothbrushes that vibrate between 2000-7000 strokes per minute, the Philips Sonicare Ultrasonic movements hit 31,000 strokes per

Visit dentalrave.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Dentalrave.com page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 22.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 4 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

dentalrave.com performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

52/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dentalrave.com

75 ms

www.dentalrave.com

74 ms

main.min.css

39 ms

style.min.css

116 ms

front.min.css

93 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Dentalrave.com, 14% (4 requests) were made to Ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Secure.statcounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.5 sec) relates to the external source Ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 170.6 kB (58%)

Content Size

293.7 kB

After Optimization

123.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Dentalrave.com main page is 293.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 212.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 170.5 kB

  • Original 212.8 kB
  • After minification 209.4 kB
  • After compression 42.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 170.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 68.1 kB
  • After minification 68.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dentalrave images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 45 B

  • Original 12.8 kB
  • After minification 12.8 kB
  • After compression 12.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (61%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dentalrave. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

dentalrave.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

dentalrave.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

dentalrave.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dentalrave.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dentalrave.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dentalrave. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: