Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

desibell.com

online gürültü izleme sistemi | online gürültü izleme | Mustafa Kemal, 2140. Cad. no 14/5, Çankaya/Ankara, Türkiye

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

84 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

190 ms

About Website

Welcome to desibell.com homepage info - get ready to check Desibell best content right away, or after learning these important things about desibell.com

Online gürültü izleme sistemi; Gürültüye kaynağında çözüm, Şehre özel gürültü yönetimini kontrol etmenizi, Gürültünün sürekli izlenmesini ve 81 ilde gürültü haritasının çıkmasını sağlar. Yerli ve mill...

Visit desibell.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Desibell.com page load time and found that the first response time was 84 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

desibell.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value24.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.095

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.6 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

desibell.com

84 ms

desibell.com

1021 ms

master.css

586 ms

css

65 ms

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

390 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Desibell.com, 67% (40 requests) were made to Afternic.com and 17% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Afternic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 385.9 kB (64%)

Content Size

605.9 kB

After Optimization

220.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Desibell.com main page is 605.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 492.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 22.8 kB

  • Original 29.4 kB
  • After minification 23.2 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.2 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 83.6 kB
  • After minification 82.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Desibell images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 361.7 kB

  • Original 492.9 kB
  • After minification 437.6 kB
  • After compression 131.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 361.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (67%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Desibell. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

desibell.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

desibell.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

desibell.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    TR

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Desibell.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Turkish is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Desibell.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Desibell. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: