Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 55

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

497 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

221 ms

About Website

Welcome to emwebmail.com homepage info - get ready to check Emwebmail best content right away, or after learning these important things about emwebmail.com

Visit emwebmail.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Emwebmail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 497 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

emwebmail.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.046

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

emwebmail.com

497 ms

index.html

468 ms

587 ms

cmp_standalone.min.js

626 ms

bootstrap.min.css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Emwebmail.com, 37% (21 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 23% (13 requests) were made to Nominalia.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (812 ms) relates to the external source Nominalia.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 25.1 kB (9%)

Content Size

291.8 kB

After Optimization

266.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Emwebmail.com main page is 291.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 180.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 573 B

  • Original 1.0 kB
  • After minification 962 B
  • After compression 433 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 573 B or 57% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 180.3 kB
  • After minification 180.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Emwebmail images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

  • Original 94.5 kB
  • After minification 94.5 kB
  • After compression 80.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.6 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 16.0 kB
  • After minification 16.0 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Emwebmail.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (74%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Emwebmail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Best Practices

emwebmail.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

emwebmail.com SEO score

55

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Emwebmail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Emwebmail.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Emwebmail. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: