Access energizer.com. Home

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.1 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,240 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.8 s

1/100

10%

energizer.com

872 ms

wonderpluginsliderengine.css

89 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

91 ms

woocommerce.css

93 ms

header-footer-elementor.css

89 ms

Our browser made a total of 156 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (124 requests) were addressed to the original Energizer.com, 12% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (5 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (872 ms) belongs to the original domain Energizer.com.

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

3.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Energizer.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 205.8 kB

Original 247.4 kB
After minification 244.1 kB
After compression 41.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 205.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

Original 2.6 MB
After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Energizer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 838.4 kB

Original 1.1 MB
After minification 1.1 MB
After compression 285.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 838.4 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 108.4 kB

Original 245.2 kB
After minification 237.0 kB
After compression 136.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Energizer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 108.4 kB or 44% of the original size.

Requests Now

137

After Optimization

The browser has sent 137 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Energizer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 29 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.