Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

eyecorp.com

Page Load Speed

31.4 sec in total

First Response

3.3 sec

Resources Loaded

27.4 sec

Page Rendered

710 ms

About Website

Visit eyecorp.com now to see the best up-to-date Eyecorp content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eyecorp.com

Visit eyecorp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Eyecorp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.3 sec and then it took 28.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eyecorp.com performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

79/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.057

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.oohmedia.com.au

3308 ms

system.base.css

559 ms

system.menus.css

557 ms

system.messages.css

553 ms

system.theme.css

564 ms

Our browser made a total of 217 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Eyecorp.com, 14% (31 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 6% (13 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.1 sec) relates to the external source Oohmedia.com.au.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (31%)

Content Size

5.7 MB

After Optimization

3.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eyecorp.com main page is 5.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 96.3 kB

  • Original 112.5 kB
  • After minification 102.2 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 433.8 kB

  • Original 4.0 MB
  • After minification 3.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Eyecorp needs image optimization as it can save up to 433.8 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 660.1 kB

  • Original 934.8 kB
  • After minification 819.0 kB
  • After compression 274.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 660.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 553.6 kB

  • Original 648.9 kB
  • After minification 551.9 kB
  • After compression 95.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eyecorp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 553.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 100 (48%)

Requests Now

210

After Optimization

110

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 210 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eyecorp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 55 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 42 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

eyecorp.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

eyecorp.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

eyecorp.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eyecorp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Eyecorp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eyecorp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: