Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

filtrexx.com

Filtrexx - Sediment control, stormwater products and services.

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

931 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

337 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Filtrexx content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about filtrexx.com

Filtrexx is the inventor of the compost filter sock (silt sock) for sediment & erosion control, stormwater management, green infrastructure, low impact development, pollutant removal and living walls ...

Visit filtrexx.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Filtrexx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 931 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filtrexx.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

filtrexx.com

931 ms

en

783 ms

c75c351a73336b8c4deca3a900b5e008a9fb9713.css

71 ms

jquery.js

81 ms

9e4b6014b2db4d9619f86ef700299d85e3e11a9b.css

76 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Filtrexx.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (931 ms) belongs to the original domain Filtrexx.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 126.3 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Filtrexx.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 46.8 kB

  • Original 57.8 kB
  • After minification 55.1 kB
  • After compression 11.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 14.1 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Filtrexx images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 65.3 kB

  • Original 173.4 kB
  • After minification 158.3 kB
  • After compression 108.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 65.3 kB or 38% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 74 B

  • Original 31.2 kB
  • After minification 31.2 kB
  • After compression 31.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filtrexx.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (43%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filtrexx. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

filtrexx.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filtrexx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filtrexx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Filtrexx. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: