Access folkr.com. FOLKR – Rise above the ordinary with Folkr’s personalized approach to WordPress design. We’re commit...

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

95/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.247

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

folkr.com

453 ms

autoptimize_e67df65c646daf3b075763de943726c6.css

114 ms

view.min.js

221 ms

javascript;base64,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

1 ms

wp-polyfill-importmap.min.js

211 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Folkr.com, 10% (1 request) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (955 ms) belongs to the original domain Folkr.com.

Content Size

717.6 kB

After Optimization

582.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Folkr.com main page is 717.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 669.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 20.5 kB

Original 25.9 kB
After minification 25.8 kB
After compression 5.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 115.0 kB

Original 669.4 kB
After minification 554.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, FOLKR needs image optimization as it can save up to 115.0 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 24 B

Original 13.3 kB
After minification 13.3 kB
After compression 13.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 65 B

Original 9.0 kB
After minification 9.0 kB
After compression 9.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Folkr.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FOLKR. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.