Report Summary

  • 19

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    36% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

footmanager.net

It's better than Sinder!

Page Load Speed

25.7 sec in total

First Response

731 ms

Resources Loaded

17 sec

Page Rendered

8 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Footmanager content for Vietnam. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about footmanager.net

FootManager.net : la référence des fans de Football Manager 2017

Visit footmanager.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Footmanager.net page load time and found that the first response time was 731 ms and then it took 25 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

footmanager.net performance score

19

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.4 s

40/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,700 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.193

64/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

footmanager.net

731 ms

www.footmanager.net

576 ms

all.css

493 ms

prettyPhoto.css

237 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

576 ms

Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Footmanager.net, 15% (15 requests) were made to Scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net and 5% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Footmanager.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 805.0 kB (32%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Footmanager.net main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 40.4 kB

  • Original 49.7 kB
  • After minification 40.3 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.4 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.4 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 44.9 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Footmanager images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 613.6 kB

  • Original 979.0 kB
  • After minification 935.7 kB
  • After compression 365.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 613.6 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 106.0 kB

  • Original 126.0 kB
  • After minification 110.4 kB
  • After compression 20.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Footmanager.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 106.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (17%)

Requests Now

98

After Optimization

81

The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Footmanager. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

footmanager.net accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

footmanager.net best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

footmanager.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Footmanager.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Footmanager.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Footmanager. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: