Access futurefamous.media. Lead Generation Agency

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,490 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.144

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.9 s

4/100

10%

futurefamous.media

149 ms

futurefamous.media

272 ms

futurefamousmedia.com

478 ms

bdt-uikit.css

136 ms

ep-helper.css

208 ms

Our browser made a total of 138 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Futurefamous.media, 83% (115 requests) were made to Futurefamousmedia.com and 12% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (832 ms) relates to the external source Futurefamousmedia.com.

Content Size

7.3 MB

After Optimization

5.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Futurefamous.media main page is 7.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 110.1 kB

Original 131.9 kB
After minification 127.3 kB
After compression 21.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 2.0 MB

Original 6.6 MB
After minification 4.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Future Famous needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.0 MB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 110.8 kB

Original 324.3 kB
After minification 324.3 kB
After compression 213.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 110.8 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 63.9 kB

Original 200.9 kB
After minification 200.9 kB
After compression 136.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futurefamous.media needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.9 kB or 32% of the original size.

Requests Now

114

After Optimization

The browser has sent 114 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Future Famous. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 37 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.