Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

gracebar.co.uk

Loading...

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

258 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

961 ms

About Website

Visit gracebar.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Gracebar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gracebar.co.uk

Visit Grace Bar, London, the ultimate bar, restaurant and party venue in the city. If you're looking for something to do in London, come visit us.

Visit gracebar.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Gracebar.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 258 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gracebar.co.uk performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

gracebar.co.uk

258 ms

grace-bar.co.uk

235 ms

css

25 ms

fatsoma-facebook-style.css

84 ms

fatsoma-twitter-style.css

166 ms

Our browser made a total of 160 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Gracebar.co.uk, 23% (37 requests) were made to Grace-bar.co.uk and 18% (28 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (962 ms) relates to the external source Grace.novus.fatsomasites.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (19%)

Content Size

6.1 MB

After Optimization

4.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gracebar.co.uk main page is 6.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 55.8 kB

  • Original 70.3 kB
  • After minification 62.5 kB
  • After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.8 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 75.7 kB

  • Original 4.6 MB
  • After minification 4.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gracebar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 338.5 kB

  • Original 500.5 kB
  • After minification 454.5 kB
  • After compression 161.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 338.5 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 697.2 kB

  • Original 882.1 kB
  • After minification 636.3 kB
  • After compression 184.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gracebar.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 697.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 72 (50%)

Requests Now

145

After Optimization

73

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 145 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gracebar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

SEO Factors

gracebar.co.uk SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gracebar.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Gracebar.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gracebar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: