Access link.goodhousekeeping.com. Recipe Ideas, Product Reviews, Home Decor Inspiration, and Beauty Tips

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,020 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.5 s

0/100

10%

www.goodhousekeeping.com

37 ms

main.css

36 ms

require-2.1.9.min.js

24 ms

Bootstrap.js

65 ms

blank.png

113 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Link.goodhousekeeping.com, 15% (2 requests) were made to Nexus.ensighten.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Goodhousekeeping.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (115 ms) relates to the external source Ghk.h-cdn.co.

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

303.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Link.goodhousekeeping.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 683.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 224.9 kB

Original 268.5 kB
After minification 267.9 kB
After compression 43.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 224.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 367 B

Original 974 B
After minification 607 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Link Good Housekeeping needs image optimization as it can save up to 367 B or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 484.2 kB

Original 683.0 kB
After minification 683.0 kB
After compression 198.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 484.2 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 414.5 kB

Original 475.1 kB
After minification 471.0 kB
After compression 60.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Link.goodhousekeeping.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 414.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Link Good Housekeeping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.