Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    67% of websites

service.goodhousekeeping.com

Page Load Speed

910 ms in total

First Response

18 ms

Resources Loaded

685 ms

Page Rendered

207 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Service Goodhousekeeping content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about service.goodhousekeeping.com

Visit service.goodhousekeeping.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Service.goodhousekeeping.com page load time and found that the first response time was 18 ms and then it took 892 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

service.goodhousekeeping.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value24.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value36.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value25.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,960 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value37.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

service.goodhousekeeping.com

18 ms

GHK_nameAddrEntry_combo.jsp

135 ms

script.js

34 ms

style.css

71 ms

balloon.js

194 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Service.goodhousekeeping.com, 74% (14 requests) were made to W1.buysub.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Subscribe.hearstmags.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (198 ms) relates to the external source W1.buysub.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 161.7 kB (57%)

Content Size

284.9 kB

After Optimization

123.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Service.goodhousekeeping.com main page is 284.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 150.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 20.4 kB

  • Original 25.5 kB
  • After minification 19.8 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.7 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 55.7 kB

  • Original 150.8 kB
  • After minification 95.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Service Goodhousekeeping needs image optimization as it can save up to 55.7 kB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 73.1 kB

  • Original 93.0 kB
  • After minification 72.0 kB
  • After compression 19.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 73.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 12.4 kB

  • Original 15.5 kB
  • After minification 11.6 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Service.goodhousekeeping.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (33%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Service Goodhousekeeping. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

service.goodhousekeeping.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

service.goodhousekeeping.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

service.goodhousekeeping.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Service.goodhousekeeping.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Service.goodhousekeeping.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Service Goodhousekeeping. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: