Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

hamcall.net

HamCall.net Amateur Radio Products and Services

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

187 ms

Resources Loaded

591 ms

Page Rendered

390 ms

About Website

Welcome to hamcall.net homepage info - get ready to check Ham Call best content for Turkey right away, or after learning these important things about hamcall.net

Visit hamcall.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Hamcall.net page load time and found that the first response time was 187 ms and then it took 981 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hamcall.net performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.3 s

98/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.5 s

70/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hamcall.net

187 ms

buckmaster.css

100 ms

background-antenna.png

127 ms

hamcall.netlogoBuckmaster.gif

126 ms

menu-HamCall30x30.png

18 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Hamcall.net, 5% (3 requests) were made to Calendar.google.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (187 ms) belongs to the original domain Hamcall.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 40.4 kB (6%)

Content Size

622.1 kB

After Optimization

581.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Hamcall.net main page is 622.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 390.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 23.6 kB

  • Original 31.0 kB
  • After minification 28.0 kB
  • After compression 7.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 13.6 kB

  • Original 390.9 kB
  • After minification 377.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ham Call images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 156 B

  • Original 196.2 kB
  • After minification 196.2 kB
  • After compression 196.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 4.0 kB
  • After minification 2.7 kB
  • After compression 898 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hamcall.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

62

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ham Call. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

hamcall.net accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

hamcall.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

hamcall.net SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hamcall.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Hamcall.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ham Call. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: