Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

Page Load Speed

425 ms in total

First Response

76 ms

Resources Loaded

280 ms

Page Rendered

69 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Heartlandweb content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about heartlandweb.com

Visit heartlandweb.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Heartlandweb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 76 ms and then it took 349 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

heartlandweb.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.5 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.06

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

heartlandweb.com

76 ms

heartlandweb.com

116 ms

email-decode.min.js

5 ms

Heartland_Tan.png

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Heartlandweb.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (116 ms) belongs to the original domain Heartlandweb.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 5.9 kB (29%)

Content Size

20.0 kB

After Optimization

14.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Heartlandweb.com main page is 20.0 kB. This result falls within a big category (top 100 000) of medium weight web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 18.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 360 B

  • Original 754 B
  • After minification 666 B
  • After compression 394 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 88 B, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 360 B or 48% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 18.6 kB
  • After minification 13.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Heartlandweb needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.5 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Heartlandweb. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

heartlandweb.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

heartlandweb.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

heartlandweb.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Heartlandweb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Heartlandweb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Heartlandweb. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: