Access intervalsonline.com. Time Tracking & Project Management for Teams

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,220 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.3 s

31/100

10%

intervalsonline.com

122 ms

intervalsonline.com

141 ms

www.myintervals.com

252 ms

intervals_083ae4948a2e31513b8d6c72168548ba.js

254 ms

js

79 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Intervalsonline.com, 52% (25 requests) were made to Myintervals.cdnedge.bluemix.net and 8% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Myintervals.cdnedge.bluemix.net.

Content Size

702.1 kB

After Optimization

247.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Intervalsonline.com main page is 702.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 340.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 101.0 kB

Original 125.5 kB
After minification 115.5 kB
After compression 24.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 159.2 kB

Original 179.6 kB
After minification 20.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Intervals Online needs image optimization as it can save up to 159.2 kB or 89% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 180.9 kB

Original 340.5 kB
After minification 340.4 kB
After compression 159.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 180.9 kB or 53% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 13.8 kB

Original 56.4 kB
After minification 56.4 kB
After compression 42.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intervalsonline.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intervals Online. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.