Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

joldit.com

携帯現金化は時間いらずにお金を換金する

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

119 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

411 ms

About Website

Welcome to joldit.com homepage info - get ready to check Joldit best content right away, or after learning these important things about joldit.com

携帯キャリア決済現金化は、主婦やアルバイトといったクレジットカードを作りにくい人でも気軽に利用できる方法です。利用する際には、携帯キャリア決済対応のお店で買い物をすること、携帯キャリア決済の上限額を知っておくことに気をつけましょう。事前に注意点を知っておけば、いざというとき慌てずに利用することができますよ。

Visit joldit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Joldit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 119 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

joldit.com performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

95/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

joldit.com

119 ms

www.joldit.com

234 ms

css

82 ms

all.9076e15bdcfb.css

167 ms

zenbox.js

141 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Joldit.com, 49% (48 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 11% (11 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (383 ms) relates to the external source Maps.googleapis.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 684.9 kB (38%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Joldit.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 57.3 kB

  • Original 66.6 kB
  • After minification 62.9 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 57.3 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 112.3 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 928.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Joldit needs image optimization as it can save up to 112.3 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 334.0 kB

  • Original 521.9 kB
  • After minification 518.1 kB
  • After compression 187.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 334.0 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-100%

Potential reduce by 181.3 kB

  • Original 181.8 kB
  • After minification 962 B
  • After compression 439 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Joldit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 181.3 kB or 100% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (30%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

61

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Joldit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

joldit.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

joldit.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

joldit.com SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Joldit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Spanish language. Our system also found out that Joldit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Joldit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: