Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    62% of other websites

  • 44

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

jool.ru

Интернет магазин музыкальных товаров Jool.ru

Page Load Speed

36.7 sec in total

First Response

2.9 sec

Resources Loaded

33.5 sec

Page Rendered

257 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Jool content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jool.ru

Доступные цены на музыкальные инструменты в интернет магазине JOOL.RU (Москва). Мы предлагаем качественные товары от известных брендов. Ознакомиться с основными характеристиками музыкальных инструмент...

Visit jool.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Jool.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 2.9 sec and then it took 33.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

jool.ru performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value12.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value28.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.096

91/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.5 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jool.ru

2927 ms

eskimobi.css

565 ms

eskimobi.js

564 ms

openapi.js

387 ms

odkl_share.css

530 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Jool.ru, 4% (4 requests) were made to Lk.mango-office.ru and 3% (3 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.9 sec) relates to the external source Lk.mango-office.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 108.4 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Jool.ru main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 28.6 kB

  • Original 38.0 kB
  • After minification 33.5 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.5 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 5.4 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jool images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 65.9 kB

  • Original 223.5 kB
  • After minification 223.4 kB
  • After compression 157.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 65.9 kB or 30% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 29.7 kB
  • After minification 29.5 kB
  • After compression 21.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jool.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (63%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

jool.ru accessibility score

44

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

SEO Factors

jool.ru SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jool.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jool.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: