Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 93

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 81% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

julesfeiffer.com

名古屋在中です。探偵依頼しようかな・・・

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

645 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

320 ms

About Website

Visit julesfeiffer.com now to see the best up-to-date Julesfeiffer content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about julesfeiffer.com

Visit julesfeiffer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Julesfeiffer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 645 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

julesfeiffer.com performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.4 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

julesfeiffer.com

645 ms

www.julesfeiffer.com

608 ms

style.css

184 ms

spacer.gif

364 ms

bt_left.gif

364 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Julesfeiffer.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (825 ms) belongs to the original domain Julesfeiffer.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 24.1 kB (42%)

Content Size

58.0 kB

After Optimization

33.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Julesfeiffer.com main page is 58.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 33.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 22.7 kB

  • Original 33.2 kB
  • After minification 33.1 kB
  • After compression 10.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 24.4 kB
  • After minification 23.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Julesfeiffer images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 52 B

  • Original 348 B
  • After minification 348 B
  • After compression 296 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Julesfeiffer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52 B or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (70%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Julesfeiffer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

julesfeiffer.com accessibility score

93

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

julesfeiffer.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

julesfeiffer.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    SHIFT_JIS

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Julesfeiffer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Julesfeiffer.com main page’s claimed encoding is shift_jis. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Julesfeiffer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: