Report Summary

  • 89

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

krisp.ai

Voice AI for Meetings: Noise Cancellation & AI Note Taker | Krisp

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

115 ms

Resources Loaded

584 ms

Page Rendered

424 ms

About Website

Welcome to krisp.ai homepage info - get ready to check Krisp best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about krisp.ai

Clear calls, smarter meetings—powered by #1 noise cancellation. Krisp brings Voice AI with an AI Note Taker, Accent AI, and Call Center AI.

Visit krisp.ai

Key Findings

We analyzed Krisp.ai page load time and found that the first response time was 115 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

krisp.ai performance score

89

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

64/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

krisp.ai

115 ms

krisp.ai

65 ms

otSDKStub.js

31 ms

experiment.umd.js

42 ms

two_front_page_minified_base.min.css

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Krisp.ai, 6% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.cookielaw.org and 2% (1 request) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (296 ms) belongs to the original domain Krisp.ai.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 91.8 kB (26%)

Content Size

352.9 kB

After Optimization

261.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Krisp.ai main page is 352.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 142.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 91.6 kB

  • Original 110.4 kB
  • After minification 110.4 kB
  • After compression 18.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 84.8 kB
  • After minification 84.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Krisp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 43 B

  • Original 142.3 kB
  • After minification 142.3 kB
  • After compression 142.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 199 B

  • Original 15.4 kB
  • After minification 15.4 kB
  • After compression 15.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Krisp.ai has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (49%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Krisp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

krisp.ai accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

krisp.ai best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

krisp.ai SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Krisp.ai can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Krisp.ai main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Krisp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: