Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 99

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    96% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

lagbag.com

lagbag.com

Page Load Speed

973 ms in total

First Response

103 ms

Resources Loaded

605 ms

Page Rendered

265 ms

About Website

Welcome to lagbag.com homepage info - get ready to check Lagbag best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about lagbag.com

Visit lagbag.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lagbag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 103 ms and then it took 870 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lagbag.com performance score

99

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lagbag.com

103 ms

lagbag.com

256 ms

styles3.css

44 ms

TjxZ6MrBl9E

69 ms

iWau4a-EihY

158 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Lagbag.com, 14% (2 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 14% (2 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (256 ms) belongs to the original domain Lagbag.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 346.1 kB (58%)

Content Size

598.0 kB

After Optimization

251.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lagbag.com main page is 598.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 246.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 4.2 kB

  • Original 7.3 kB
  • After minification 6.8 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.2 kB or 57% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

  • Original 138.2 kB
  • After minification 135.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lagbag images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 134.6 kB

  • Original 205.6 kB
  • After minification 205.5 kB
  • After compression 71.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 134.6 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 204.7 kB

  • Original 246.8 kB
  • After minification 245.8 kB
  • After compression 42.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lagbag.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 204.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lagbag. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

lagbag.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

lagbag.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

lagbag.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lagbag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lagbag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lagbag. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: