Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

larimar.com

MarahLago Larimar Jewelry Authorized Dealer | Larimarket

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

279 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

230 ms

About Website

Visit larimar.com now to see the best up-to-date Larimar content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about larimar.com

Featuring a huge selection of MarahLago Larimar Jewelry, along with exceptional Larimar jewelry by designers from around the world. Free Shipping & Free Returns, too!

Visit larimar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Larimar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 279 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

larimar.com performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.139

80/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.0 s

66/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

larimar.com

279 ms

bat.js

76 ms

widget.js

76 ms

fbevents.js

16 ms

css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Larimar.com, 68% (50 requests) were made to Cdn.shopify.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to W2.yotpo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (529 ms) relates to the external source W2.yotpo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 594.9 kB (23%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Larimar.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 70.2 kB

  • Original 84.4 kB
  • After minification 77.9 kB
  • After compression 14.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Larimar images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 310.6 kB

  • Original 438.3 kB
  • After minification 379.5 kB
  • After compression 127.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 310.6 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 203.8 kB

  • Original 233.5 kB
  • After minification 183.7 kB
  • After compression 29.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Larimar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 203.8 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (63%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

25

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Larimar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

larimar.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

larimar.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

larimar.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Larimar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Larimar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Larimar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: