4.6 sec in total
162 ms
2.7 sec
1.8 sec
Visit lifeguardmaster.com now to see the best up-to-date Lifeguardmaster content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifeguardmaster.com
♠(gc98.cc)购彩就发 恭喜发财♠彩88iv是颇受彩民欢迎的线上购彩平台,官网服务至上,玩家的技巧心得都可以在这里分享,如果喜欢,记得收藏本站发财哦~
Visit lifeguardmaster.comWe analyzed Lifeguardmaster.com page load time and found that the first response time was 162 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
lifeguardmaster.com performance score
162 ms
695 ms
182 ms
141 ms
132 ms
Our browser made a total of 117 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (93 requests) were addressed to the original Lifeguardmaster.com, 3% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Lifeguardequipmentandapparel.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifeguardmaster.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (25%)
5.0 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Lifeguardmaster.com main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 146.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 146.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 228.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifeguardmaster images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 388.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 388.0 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 507.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifeguardmaster.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 507.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (33%)
112
75
The browser has sent 112 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifeguardmaster. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
lifeguardmaster.com SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifeguardmaster.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Lifeguardmaster.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
lifeguardmaster.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lifeguardmaster. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: