Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

liscott.com

Liscott Custom Homes, LTD - Building dreams for over 25 years

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

77 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

423 ms

About Website

Welcome to liscott.com homepage info - get ready to check Liscott best content right away, or after learning these important things about liscott.com

Liscott Custom Homes has built custom homes in Colorado, Wyoming, Nebraska, and Western Kansas. If you can dream it, we can build it!

Visit liscott.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Liscott.com page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

liscott.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.3 s

29/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,200 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.091

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

liscott.com

77 ms

www.liscott.com

384 ms

share.min.css

14 ms

genericons.min.css

36 ms

style.min.css

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 70 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Liscott.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (384 ms) belongs to the original domain Liscott.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 137.2 kB (7%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Liscott.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 54.3 kB

  • Original 68.2 kB
  • After minification 67.2 kB
  • After compression 13.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Liscott images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 71.5 kB
  • After minification 71.5 kB
  • After compression 63.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.4 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 63.6 kB

  • Original 145.0 kB
  • After minification 127.3 kB
  • After compression 81.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Liscott.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.6 kB or 44% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (50%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

31

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Liscott. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

liscott.com accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

liscott.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

liscott.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Liscott.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Liscott.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Liscott. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: