Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 13

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    25% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 70

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

littleprofile.com

Page Load Speed

12.6 sec in total

First Response

550 ms

Resources Loaded

10.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.9 sec

About Website

Welcome to littleprofile.com homepage info - get ready to check Littleprofile best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about littleprofile.com

Littleprofile.com is a great place to create your storefront and profile and share it with the world

Visit littleprofile.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Littleprofile.com page load time and found that the first response time was 550 ms and then it took 12 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

littleprofile.com performance score

13

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,030 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.163

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.4 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

littleprofile.com

550 ms

style.css

599 ms

font-awesome.min.css

313 ms

bootstrap.min.css

1133 ms

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

835 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Littleprofile.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to W.sharethis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Littleprofile.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (16%)

Content Size

6.2 MB

After Optimization

5.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Littleprofile.com main page is 6.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 22.0 kB

  • Original 26.5 kB
  • After minification 20.7 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 433.6 kB

  • Original 5.4 MB
  • After minification 5.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Littleprofile images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 393.2 kB

  • Original 591.3 kB
  • After minification 591.1 kB
  • After compression 198.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 393.2 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 164.9 kB

  • Original 198.3 kB
  • After minification 183.7 kB
  • After compression 33.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Littleprofile.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 164.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (36%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

35

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Littleprofile. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

littleprofile.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

littleprofile.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

littleprofile.com SEO score

70

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Littleprofile.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Littleprofile.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Littleprofile. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: