Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 41

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

mir.travel

Отдых в России: путешествие по России, путеводитель — Рамблер/путешествия

Page Load Speed

7.6 sec in total

First Response

568 ms

Resources Loaded

5.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

About Website

Welcome to mir.travel homepage info - get ready to check Mir best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about mir.travel

Популярные и горящие туры, обзоры мест для отдыха и экскурсий, путешествие по городам и рассказы о местных достопримечательностях

Visit mir.travel

Key Findings

We analyzed Mir.travel page load time and found that the first response time was 568 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

mir.travel performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.7 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,230 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.033

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.8 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

mir.travel

568 ms

mir.afisha.ru

702 ms

1da88c4657f53e3bbd68.vendors.js

938 ms

js

107 ms

head.js

1246 ms

Our browser made a total of 124 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Mir.travel, 19% (24 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 8% (10 requests) were made to Relap.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) relates to the external source Cdn00.mir.afisha.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 849.4 kB (5%)

Content Size

16.5 MB

After Optimization

15.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Mir.travel main page is 16.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 14.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 324.0 kB

  • Original 408.3 kB
  • After minification 408.3 kB
  • After compression 84.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 324.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 24.3 kB

  • Original 14.7 MB
  • After minification 14.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mir images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 249.6 kB

  • Original 502.3 kB
  • After minification 499.0 kB
  • After compression 252.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 249.6 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 251.4 kB

  • Original 803.7 kB
  • After minification 803.6 kB
  • After compression 552.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mir.travel needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 251.4 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (47%)

Requests Now

109

After Optimization

58

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 109 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mir. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

mir.travel accessibility score

41

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

mir.travel best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

mir.travel SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mir.travel can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Mir.travel main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mir. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: