Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

nailschick.com

2024新澳门历史记录查询-免费公开资料大全

Page Load Speed

14.9 sec in total

First Response

228 ms

Resources Loaded

13.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Nailschick content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about nailschick.com

2024新澳门历史记录查询集自主研发、自主运营于一身的互联网企业，为中国十大2024新澳门历史记录查询研发及运营公司之一，2024新澳门历史记录查询是一家拥有自主知识产权，专门从事2024新澳门历史记录查询的高科技公司。

Visit nailschick.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Nailschick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 228 ms and then it took 14.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

nailschick.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value28.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.631

9/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

nailschick.com

228 ms

www.nailschick.com

6753 ms

bootstrap.min_v_1725606643.css

2073 ms

iconfont_v_1725606643.css

2002 ms

swiper-bundle.min.css

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Nailschick.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Sdk.51.la and 1% (1 request) were made to Collect-v6.51.la. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Nailschick.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 192.6 kB (3%)

Content Size

5.9 MB

After Optimization

5.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Nailschick.com main page is 5.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 92.9 kB

  • Original 108.0 kB
  • After minification 67.9 kB
  • After compression 15.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 40.2 kB, which is 37% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 98.7 kB

  • Original 5.8 MB
  • After minification 5.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nailschick images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 942 B

  • Original 7.7 kB
  • After minification 7.7 kB
  • After compression 6.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nailschick.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 942 B or 12% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (26%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

55

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nailschick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

nailschick.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

nailschick.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

nailschick.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    ZH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nailschick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nailschick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nailschick. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: