Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 93

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

namegrep.com

Fast Domain Name Search | namegrep

Page Load Speed

456 ms in total

First Response

58 ms

Resources Loaded

298 ms

Page Rendered

100 ms

About Website

Welcome to namegrep.com homepage info - get ready to check Name Grep best content for Bangladesh right away, or after learning these important things about namegrep.com

Fast and powerful domain name search for geeks, with regexes and curated sets.

Visit namegrep.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Namegrep.com page load time and found that the first response time was 58 ms and then it took 398 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

namegrep.com performance score

93

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

97/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

93/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

namegrep.com

58 ms

namegrep.com

48 ms

namegrep.css

9 ms

jquery.min.js

66 ms

namegrep.js

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Namegrep.com, 17% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (66 ms) relates to the external source Ajax.googleapis.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 24.9 kB (45%)

Content Size

55.2 kB

After Optimization

30.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Namegrep.com main page is 55.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 28.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

  • Original 28.8 kB
  • After minification 26.7 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5.4 kB
  • After minification 5.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Name Grep images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Name Grep. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

namegrep.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

namegrep.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

namegrep.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Namegrep.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Namegrep.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Name Grep. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: