Access nutritionarsenal.com.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

25/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

86/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.253

49/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

nutritionarsenal.com

90 ms

default.aspx

369 ms

normalize.css

60 ms

style.css

110 ms

jqueryui.css

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Nutritionarsenal.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Trustlogo.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Verify.authorize.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.9 sec) relates to the external source Trustlogo.com.

Content Size

753.9 kB

After Optimization

522.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Nutritionarsenal.com main page is 753.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 411.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 116.3 kB

Original 134.0 kB
After minification 114.4 kB
After compression 17.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.6 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.3 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 68.9 kB

Original 411.2 kB
After minification 342.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Nutritionarsenal needs image optimization as it can save up to 68.9 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 34.0 kB

Original 181.9 kB
After minification 180.9 kB
After compression 147.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.0 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 12.3 kB

Original 26.8 kB
After minification 25.8 kB
After compression 14.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nutritionarsenal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.3 kB or 46% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nutritionarsenal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.