Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

subscribers.nutritionbusinessjournal.com

Nutrition Business Journal | New Hope

Page Load Speed

2.5 sec in total

First Response

140 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

272 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Subscribers Nutrition Business Journal content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about subscribers.nutritionbusinessjournal.com

Nutrition Business Journal

Visit subscribers.nutritionbusinessjournal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Subscribers.nutritionbusinessjournal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 140 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

subscribers.nutritionbusinessjournal.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

subscribers.nutritionbusinessjournal.com

140 ms

nutrition-business-journal

228 ms

dpm_8effee409c625e1a2d8f5033631840e6ce1dcb64.min.js

43 ms

cc_af.js

88 ms

in.js

11 ms

Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Subscribers.nutritionbusinessjournal.com, 41% (45 requests) were made to Newhope.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Barchartwidgets.websol.barchart.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (520 ms) relates to the external source Newhope.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (57%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

808.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Subscribers.nutritionbusinessjournal.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 111.6 kB

  • Original 150.2 kB
  • After minification 144.6 kB
  • After compression 38.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 111.6 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 29.1 kB

  • Original 286.9 kB
  • After minification 257.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Subscribers Nutrition Business Journal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 682.8 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB
  • After compression 447.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 682.8 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 269.3 kB

  • Original 334.0 kB
  • After minification 332.2 kB
  • After compression 64.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Subscribers.nutritionbusinessjournal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 269.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (64%)

Requests Now

101

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Subscribers Nutrition Business Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

subscribers.nutritionbusinessjournal.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Subscribers.nutritionbusinessjournal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Subscribers.nutritionbusinessjournal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Subscribers Nutrition Business Journal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: