Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

painm.com

Ultimate Pain Management

Page Load Speed

565 ms in total

First Response

190 ms

Resources Loaded

276 ms

Page Rendered

99 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Pain M content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about painm.com

Health, Health Problems, Rheumatology, Pain Management

Visit painm.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Painm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 190 ms and then it took 375 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

painm.com performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

86/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

painm.com

190 ms

styles.css

8 ms

jquery-1.6.1.min.js

8 ms

logo.png

32 ms

list-style1.png

3 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Painm.com, 9% (1 request) were made to Easycounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (190 ms) belongs to the original domain Painm.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 33.8 kB (10%)

Content Size

349.3 kB

After Optimization

315.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Painm.com main page is 349.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 300.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 15.9 kB
  • After minification 14.4 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 64% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 23.2 kB

  • Original 300.0 kB
  • After minification 276.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Pain M images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 31.9 kB
  • After minification 31.9 kB
  • After compression 31.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 310 B

  • Original 1.5 kB
  • After minification 1.5 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Painm.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 310 B or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Pain M. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

painm.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

painm.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

painm.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Painm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Painm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Pain M. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: