Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

pdq.com

PDQ: Software Deployment & Inventory Management done right

Page Load Speed

868 ms in total

First Response

30 ms

Resources Loaded

412 ms

Page Rendered

426 ms

About Website

Welcome to pdq.com homepage info - get ready to check PDQ best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about pdq.com

PDQ has simple, secure, and pretty damn quick IT device management solutions for effortless software deployment and patching. Streamline your system admin tasks.

Visit pdq.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Pdq.com page load time and found that the first response time was 30 ms and then it took 838 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

pdq.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

80/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,220 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pdq.com

30 ms

www.pdq.com

187 ms

a1a3008ae51f3967.css

60 ms

polyfills-c67a75d1b6f99dc8.js

86 ms

webpack-2a16c991abe29165.js

131 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Pdq.com, 84% (75 requests) were made to Images.ctfassets.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (187 ms) belongs to the original domain Pdq.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 195.6 kB (79%)

Content Size

248.1 kB

After Optimization

52.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Pdq.com main page is 248.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 229.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 193.5 kB

  • Original 229.1 kB
  • After minification 226.8 kB
  • After compression 35.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 193.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

  • Original 19.0 kB
  • After minification 16.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, PDQ needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.1 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (26%)

Requests Now

87

After Optimization

64

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PDQ. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

pdq.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Best Practices

pdq.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

pdq.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Pdq.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Pdq.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PDQ. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: