Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

phifer.com

Insect Screening, Sun Shading, Outdoor Fabrics & More | Phifer

Page Load Speed

925 ms in total

First Response

39 ms

Resources Loaded

613 ms

Page Rendered

273 ms

About Website

Welcome to phifer.com homepage info - get ready to check Phifer best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about phifer.com

From insect screening & sun control fabrics to pool & patio screens and outdoor fabric, Phifer screen manufacturing has what you need for your space.

Visit phifer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Phifer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 39 ms and then it took 886 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

phifer.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

phifer.com

39 ms

www.phifer.com

84 ms

css

28 ms

normalize.css

19 ms

main.css

118 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Phifer.com, 11% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (293 ms) relates to the external source Koi-1b50v7g.sharpspring.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 394.8 kB (44%)

Content Size

893.4 kB

After Optimization

498.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Phifer.com main page is 893.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 367.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 15.3 kB

  • Original 21.1 kB
  • After minification 18.8 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.2 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.3 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 367.4 kB
  • After minification 363.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Phifer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 248.7 kB

  • Original 364.3 kB
  • After minification 316.2 kB
  • After compression 115.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 248.7 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 126.9 kB

  • Original 140.7 kB
  • After minification 101.1 kB
  • After compression 13.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Phifer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 126.9 kB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (66%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Phifer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

phifer.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Phifer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Phifer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Phifer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: