Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

phoneclaim.com

Mobile insurance claims | Asurion

Page Load Speed

652 ms in total

First Response

14 ms

Resources Loaded

480 ms

Page Rendered

158 ms

About Website

Welcome to phoneclaim.com homepage info - get ready to check Phoneclaim best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about phoneclaim.com

Filing a claim with Asurion online is quick and easy. Just choose your carrier and phone model and get your phone quickly replaced or repaired.

Visit phoneclaim.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Phoneclaim.com page load time and found that the first response time was 14 ms and then it took 638 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

phoneclaim.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value24.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,510 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

phoneclaim.com

14 ms

phoneclaim

20 ms

160 ms

asurion-logo_svg.svg

32 ms

seal

46 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Phoneclaim.com, 80% (44 requests) were made to Images.ctfassets.net and 9% (5 requests) were made to Asurion.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (160 ms) relates to the external source Asurion.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 303.3 kB (21%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Phoneclaim.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 275.2 kB

  • Original 331.5 kB
  • After minification 323.1 kB
  • After compression 56.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 275.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 28.1 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Phoneclaim images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

46

  • Images

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Phoneclaim. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

phoneclaim.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

phoneclaim.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

phoneclaim.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a valid hreflang

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Phoneclaim.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Phoneclaim.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Phoneclaim. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: