Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    25% of websites

port.hu

PORT.hu

Page Load Speed

10.7 sec in total

First Response

730 ms

Resources Loaded

9.3 sec

Page Rendered

680 ms

About Website

Visit port.hu now to see the best up-to-date PORT content for Hungary and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about port.hu

mozi, tv, színház, jegyvásárlás

Visit port.hu

Key Findings

We analyzed Port.hu page load time and found that the first response time was 730 ms and then it took 9.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

port.hu performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value29.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,860 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.176

68/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value35.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

port.hu

730 ms

bootstrap.min.css

948 ms

global.css

779 ms

layout.css

344 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

621 ms

Our browser made a total of 251 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Port.hu, 54% (136 requests) were made to Media.port.hu and 3% (7 requests) were made to Cdn.blog.hu. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.blog.hu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (39%)

Content Size

4.7 MB

After Optimization

2.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Port.hu main page is 4.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 705.2 kB
  • After compression 104.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 424.1 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 105.4 kB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. PORT images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 482.6 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 573.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 482.6 kB or 46% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 235.4 kB

  • Original 591.0 kB
  • After minification 590.6 kB
  • After compression 355.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Port.hu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 235.4 kB or 40% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 95 (39%)

Requests Now

242

After Optimization

147

The browser has sent 242 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of PORT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 72 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

port.hu accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

port.hu best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

port.hu SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    HU

  • Language Claimed

    HU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Port.hu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Hungarian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Port.hu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PORT. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: