Access printeredible.com. 澳门·威尼克斯人（中国）官方网站

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.2 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value520 ms

56/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.001

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

55/100

10%

printeredible.com

932 ms

printeredible.com

835 ms

www.printeredible.com

428 ms

www.printeredible.com

1089 ms

show.js

1186 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Printeredible.com, 19% (16 requests) were made to Jifa001.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Hm.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Printeredible.com.

Content Size

4.9 MB

After Optimization

4.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Printeredible.com main page is 4.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 10.0 kB

Original 12.9 kB
After minification 10.8 kB
After compression 3.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.1 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 385.2 kB

Original 4.8 MB
After minification 4.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Printeredible images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 7.8 kB

Original 56.2 kB
After minification 56.1 kB
After compression 48.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

Original 17.4 kB
After minification 17.4 kB
After compression 14.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Printeredible.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Printeredible. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.