Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

radb.net

The Internet Routing Registry - RADb

Page Load Speed

925 ms in total

First Response

209 ms

Resources Loaded

580 ms

Page Rendered

136 ms

About Website

Welcome to radb.net homepage info - get ready to check RADb best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about radb.net

The Internet Routing Registry

Visit radb.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Radb.net page load time and found that the first response time was 209 ms and then it took 716 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

radb.net performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

33/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

radb.net

209 ms

ga.js

15 ms

MeritRADb_top_logo.gif

43 ms

main_slider.jpg

359 ms

main_boxes_110315_01.jpg

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Radb.net, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (359 ms) belongs to the original domain Radb.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 17.8 kB (7%)

Content Size

265.2 kB

After Optimization

247.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Radb.net main page is 265.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 226.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 17.1 kB

  • Original 21.2 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 621 B

  • Original 226.8 kB
  • After minification 226.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RADb images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

38

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RADb. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

radb.net accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

radb.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

radb.net SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Radb.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Radb.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RADb. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: