Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

radiojock.com

Page Load Speed

825 ms in total

First Response

179 ms

Resources Loaded

493 ms

Page Rendered

153 ms

About Website

Welcome to radiojock.com homepage info - get ready to check Radiojock best content right away, or after learning these important things about radiojock.com

Radiojock.com the website for Professional Broadcasters. Production and Equipment sources, Music, Charts, Show Prep, and Mix Jocks. Links to related websites.

Visit radiojock.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Radiojock.com page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 646 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

radiojock.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

radiojock.com

179 ms

nb1on.gif

49 ms

nb2on.gif

56 ms

nb3on.gif

56 ms

nb4on.gif

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Radiojock.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (257 ms) belongs to the original domain Radiojock.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 8.6 kB (31%)

Content Size

28.2 kB

After Optimization

19.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Radiojock.com main page is 28.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 17.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 10.7 kB
  • After minification 10.4 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 498 B

  • Original 17.5 kB
  • After minification 17.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Radiojock images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (62%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

17

  • Images

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Radiojock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

radiojock.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

radiojock.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

radiojock.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Radiojock.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Radiojock.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Radiojock. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: