3.5 sec in total
22 ms
252 ms
3.2 sec
Click here to check amazing Reachforthewall content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about reachforthewall.com
The Emergency, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (EPN)
Visit reachforthewall.comWe analyzed Reachforthewall.com page load time and found that the first response time was 22 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
reachforthewall.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
88/100
10%
Value3.6 s
60/100
25%
Value1.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.8 s
100/100
10%
22 ms
94 ms
28 ms
115 ms
113 ms
Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Reachforthewall.com, 86% (6 requests) were made to Epn.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (115 ms) relates to the external source Epn.org.
Page size can be reduced by 262.9 kB (35%)
751.7 kB
488.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Reachforthewall.com main page is 751.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 450.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 262.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 262.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Reachforthewall images are well optimized though.
We found no issues to fix!
5
5
The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Reachforthewall. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
reachforthewall.com accessibility score
reachforthewall.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
reachforthewall.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Reachforthewall.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Reachforthewall.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
reachforthewall.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Reachforthewall. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: