Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

replytopatric.com

亚洲成AV人片在线观看福利_一本无码字幕在线人妻少妇_啪一啪天天爱天天做

Page Load Speed

487 ms in total

First Response

105 ms

Resources Loaded

276 ms

Page Rendered

106 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Replytopatric content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about replytopatric.com

很牛影視(www.replytopatric.com)亚洲成AV人片在线观看福利手機看片影視,一本无码字幕在线人妻少妇擁有海量影視資源,欧美成人GV在线观看看資源免費看,亚州无码最熱門最齊全的電影!

Visit replytopatric.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Replytopatric.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 382 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

replytopatric.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

replytopatric.com

105 ms

supportsuite.gif

161 ms

background-line.jpg

130 ms

replytopatric-button.png

158 ms

icon-important.png

131 ms

Our browser made a total of 7 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Replytopatric.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (161 ms) belongs to the original domain Replytopatric.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 6.2 kB (19%)

Content Size

33.5 kB

After Optimization

27.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Replytopatric.com main page is 33.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 29.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 3.3 kB

  • Original 4.4 kB
  • After minification 4.1 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 29.1 kB
  • After minification 26.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Replytopatric images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Replytopatric. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

replytopatric.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

replytopatric.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

replytopatric.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Replytopatric.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Replytopatric.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Replytopatric. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: