Access reviewshark.com. Review Shark - Honest, Unbiased Reviews. Helping Consumers Make Better Choices,

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.5 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,500 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.5 s

3/100

10%

reviewshark.com

109 ms

css2

46 ms

js

98 ms

css

58 ms

global.css

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Reviewshark.com, 10% (11 requests) were made to Fast.wistia.net and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (379 ms) belongs to the original domain Reviewshark.com.

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

644.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Reviewshark.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 866.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 197.9 kB

Original 242.1 kB
After minification 237.5 kB
After compression 44.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 197.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 445.2 kB

Original 866.1 kB
After minification 421.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Review Shark needs image optimization as it can save up to 445.2 kB or 51% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 475.7 kB

Original 629.3 kB
After minification 629.3 kB
After compression 153.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 475.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 5 B

Original 26.0 kB
After minification 26.0 kB
After compression 26.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Reviewshark.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

100

After Optimization

The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Review Shark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.