Access rhodescook.com. RhodesCook.com - Recent Issues Available for Purchase

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

54/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.058

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

rhodescook.com

127 ms

common.css

36 ms

squarespace-gallery-slideshow.css

19 ms

yahoo-dom-event.js

35 ms

connection_core-min.js

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Rhodescook.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Static1.1.sqspcdn.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (127 ms) belongs to the original domain Rhodescook.com.

Content Size

423.8 kB

After Optimization

134.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Rhodescook.com main page is 423.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 246.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 33.3 kB

Original 40.9 kB
After minification 36.9 kB
After compression 7.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 28.6 kB

Original 86.8 kB
After minification 58.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rhodes Cook needs image optimization as it can save up to 28.6 kB or 33% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 185.6 kB

Original 246.1 kB
After minification 209.5 kB
After compression 60.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 185.6 kB or 75% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 42.1 kB

Original 50.1 kB
After minification 39.9 kB
After compression 7.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rhodescook.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rhodes Cook. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.