Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    42% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

richystar.com

?Թ??????? ?ͧ???? ?ͧ??ѭ?????? ?ͧ??ѭ??????Դ ?Թ??Ҿ??????? ?ͧ???????? ?ͧ??ѭ???? ?ͧ??ѭ ?ͧ??????֡ ?ͧ??ѭ ?ͧ??ѭ?????? ෾??Ҩչ ෾???⪤??? ?ǹ??? ????ѧ?Ѩ??¹? ?ǹ?? ??...

Page Load Speed

13 sec in total

First Response

517 ms

Resources Loaded

12.2 sec

Page Rendered

264 ms

About Website

Visit richystar.com now to see the best up-to-date Richystar content for Thailand and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about richystar.com

?Թ??????? ?ͧ???? ?ͧ??ѭ?????? ?ͧ??ѭ??????Դ ?Թ??Ҿ??????? ?ͧ???????? ?ͧ??ѭ???? ?ͧ??ѭ ?ͧ??????֡ ?ͧ??ѭ ?ͧ??ѭ?????? ෾??Ҩչ ෾???⪤??? ?ǹ??? ????ѧ?Ѩ??¹? ?ǹ?? ????????? ???? ?觧ҹ ?ͧ??ѭ?觧ҹ ?Ѻ??ԭ?Ҵٴǧ ?ǧ?ǧ???????

Visit richystar.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Richystar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 517 ms and then it took 12.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

richystar.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,070 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.075

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.3 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

richystar.com

517 ms

www.richystar.com

1201 ms

jquery-1.3.2.js

731 ms

jquery.lazyload.js

519 ms

api.js

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 266 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (139 requests) were addressed to the original Richystar.com, 47% (125 requests) were made to Vc1i.rweb-images.com and 0% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) relates to the external source Vc1i.rweb-images.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (36%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Richystar.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 171.3 kB

  • Original 188.8 kB
  • After minification 187.6 kB
  • After compression 17.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 171.3 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 3.4 MB
  • After minification 2.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Richystar needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 18.4 kB

  • Original 271.2 kB
  • After minification 271.2 kB
  • After compression 252.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 5.8 kB
  • After minification 5.8 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Richystar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.5 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (8%)

Requests Now

138

After Optimization

127

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 138 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Richystar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

richystar.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

richystar.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

richystar.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    HY

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-874

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Richystar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Armenian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Richystar.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-874. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Richystar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: