Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

roadshamer.com

YouTube

Page Load Speed

10.3 sec in total

First Response

63 ms

Resources Loaded

10.1 sec

Page Rendered

45 ms

About Website

Visit roadshamer.com now to see the best up-to-date Roadshamer content for Israel and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about roadshamer.com

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

Visit roadshamer.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Roadshamer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 63 ms and then it took 10.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

roadshamer.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

38/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,740 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

52/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

roadshamer.com

63 ms

roadshamer.com

1740 ms

style.min.css

33 ms

style.css

40 ms

source-serif-pro-v7-latin-regular.woff

196 ms

Our browser made a total of 182 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Roadshamer.com, 70% (127 requests) were made to Seo-wp-images-bucket.s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com and 14% (25 requests) were made to Gamblingnews.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Seo-wp-images-bucket.s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (8%)

Content Size

18.5 MB

After Optimization

17.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Roadshamer.com main page is 18.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 16.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB
  • After compression 270.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 16.8 MB
  • After minification 16.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Roadshamer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 49 B

  • Original 50.7 kB
  • After minification 50.7 kB
  • After compression 50.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 23.9 kB
  • After minification 23.9 kB
  • After compression 21.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roadshamer.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (10%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

44

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roadshamer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

roadshamer.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

roadshamer.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

roadshamer.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roadshamer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Roadshamer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Roadshamer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: