Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

rodl.com

Business Internet | EarthLink

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

124 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

678 ms

About Website

Welcome to rodl.com homepage info - get ready to check Rodl best content right away, or after learning these important things about rodl.com

EarthLink’s Business Internet is built for small business owners who have a lot on their plate. With free business listings and more, see what we can do.

Visit rodl.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rodl.com page load time and found that the first response time was 124 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rodl.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.0 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,480 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rodl.com

124 ms

69 ms

39 ms

187 ms

gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css

37 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rodl.com, 82% (73 requests) were made to Business.earthlink.net and 10% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (493 ms) relates to the external source Business.earthlink.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.2 kB (0%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Rodl.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 550.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 149 B

  • Original 390 B
  • After minification 389 B
  • After compression 241 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 149 B or 38% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 16.8 kB
  • After minification 16.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rodl images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 550.4 kB
  • After minification 550.4 kB
  • After compression 547.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 505.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (88%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

9

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rodl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Best Practices

rodl.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rodl.com SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rodl.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rodl.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rodl. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: