Access roofman.me. RoofMan Official Blog | "If we teach today as we taught yesterday, we rob our children of tomorrow."

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,210 ms

20/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.5 s

0/100

10%

roofman.me

23 ms

roofman.me

204 ms

global.css

167 ms

169 ms

166 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 24% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Roofman.me, 15% (9 requests) were made to S2.wp.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (539 ms) belongs to the original domain Roofman.me.

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

813.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Roofman.me main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 429.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 81.8 kB

Original 107.9 kB
After minification 104.1 kB
After compression 26.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.8 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

Original 362.1 kB
After minification 360.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Roof Man images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

Original 344.5 kB
After minification 344.5 kB
After compression 340.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 343.7 kB

Original 429.0 kB
After minification 428.2 kB
After compression 85.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roofman.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 343.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roof Man. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.