1.6 sec in total
92 ms
1.1 sec
414 ms
Visit rubypond.com now to see the best up-to-date Rubypond content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rubypond.com
Product Management, Tech, Startups & Early Stage Investment
Visit rubypond.comWe analyzed Rubypond.com page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
rubypond.com performance score
92 ms
321 ms
253 ms
23 ms
20 ms
Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rubypond.com, 30% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.com and 17% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.contentfocus.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (321 ms) relates to the external source Glenngillen.com.
Page size can be reduced by 228.7 kB (35%)
660.6 kB
432.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Rubypond.com main page is 660.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 351.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.0 kB, which is 39% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rubypond images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 186.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 186.0 kB or 63% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (31%)
13
9
The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rubypond. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
rubypond.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rubypond.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rubypond.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
rubypond.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rubypond. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: