Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

salvamont.org

Salvamont Blog -

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

67 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

965 ms

About Website

Welcome to salvamont.org homepage info - get ready to check Salvamont best content right away, or after learning these important things about salvamont.org

Visit salvamont.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Salvamont.org page load time and found that the first response time was 67 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

salvamont.org performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

38/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

80/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

salvamont.org

67 ms

salvamont.org

631 ms

style.min.css

768 ms

publicCSS.css

638 ms

all.min.css

839 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Salvamont.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Salvamont.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 589.7 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

922.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Salvamont.org main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 986.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-94%

Potential reduce by 427.9 kB

  • Original 455.5 kB
  • After minification 455.5 kB
  • After compression 27.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 427.9 kB or 94% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 147.4 kB

  • Original 986.5 kB
  • After minification 839.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Salvamont needs image optimization as it can save up to 147.4 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 14.5 kB

  • Original 69.8 kB
  • After minification 69.8 kB
  • After compression 55.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Salvamont.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.5 kB or 21% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (45%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Salvamont. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

salvamont.org accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

salvamont.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

salvamont.org SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RO

  • Language Claimed

    RO

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Salvamont.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Romanian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Salvamont.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Salvamont. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: